Recent posts

#1
General Discussion / Re: Post crash analysis- did t...
Last post by GuyOReilly - Today at 06:22:56 PM
Change in CG location due to battery pack not secure.
Guy
#2
General Discussion / Re: Post crash analysis- did t...
Last post by Frank v B - Today at 05:41:55 PM
Mark, I like your idea on the failures randomly programmed into RealFlight.

After 30 years of flying, the following should be programmed in:
- elevator coming off after a violent maneuver.  Probability 1 in 100 flights (had it happen once)
- engine cutting out 5 seconds after take-off.  Prob 1 in 20 for electric.  1 in 10 flights for IC.
- aileron unhinging 1 in 200 flights. (had it happen twice).   One caused a violent crash.
- servo failure 1 in 100 per surface (aileron, elevator, rudder).  (happened once-vibration cut through the elevator servo wire)
- broken stab half (had it happen!)
- prop flying off the motor on take-off or randomly after going to full throttle for vertical. (Happened twice).
- battery falling out/battery failure (had it happen twice!). 1 in 200
- wheel coming off on take-off and landing. Had it happen three times.
- retracts getting stuck up (belly land) or down (but not locked).
- servo horn/aileron horn breaking in flight. 1 in 300
- stabilization accidentally turning on or off.  Caused an Apprentice fly-away.
- mid-air collision.  Had it happen twice (one chewed up my rudder from behind, one sheared off the top of my fin/rudder).
-
-
- please add your own!
-
-
-
-

You can add your own....  Please!  I will update this post with your ideas to make the final list and forward it to Horizon Hobbies. Without these items they should be forced to call it "near (or mostly) RealFlight". Truth in advertising. ;D

Neat idea.

Frank
#3
General Discussion / Re: which batteries are better...
Last post by Bridger - Today at 04:15:43 PM
thanks Michael
#4
General Discussion / Re: Post crash analysis- did t...
Last post by ppalumbo - Today at 01:58:41 PM
Quote from: msatin on Yesterday at 11:14:36 PMPerhaps RealFlight (RC Flight Simulator) should include various types of failures into the their sim

Thats a really good idea Mark!!  It would go a long way in evolving piloting skills.... and would be super fun without the cost  :) 
#5
I started covering with fabric-texture plastic covering, Oratex.

I used translucent white for the bottoms of the wings, ailerons, elevator and stabilizer, and also on the rudder which will be painted.

I'm trying to do a nice job, so I'm working slowly.

#6
General Discussion / Re: which batteries are better...
Last post by Michael - Today at 01:24:08 PM
Good choice on the Apprentice.

3S 3200 (or 3000 up to 3300) seem to be the most popular, and can often yield 10+ minute flights.
#7
General Discussion / which batteries are better?
Last post by Bridger - Today at 10:24:08 AM
Hi All
I have finally put together my first big boy plane, the Apprentice and have a question re batteries. I have a single 3s 2200mAh that im using for setting the plane up, I want to get a couple of batteries for flying. The plane will take 3s 3200-4000mAh. Is it worth buying the 4000 mAh battery? It's heavier, more expansive and does it really offer that much extra flight time? I would appreciate any opinions on this, please help the new boy  ;)
#8
General Discussion / Re: Post crash analysis- did t...
Last post by msatin - Yesterday at 11:14:36 PM
Perhaps RealFlight (RC Flight Simulator) should include various types of failures into the their sim
#9
General Discussion / Re: Post crash analysis- did t...
Last post by msatin - Yesterday at 10:41:08 PM
It's interesting that both the output gear and the the smaller white gear, both had broken teeth.
Would one losing teeth cause the other to lose them as well?
#10
General Discussion / Post crash analysis- did the f...
Last post by Frank v B - Yesterday at 09:59:18 PM
A member crashed an airplane and found an aileron servo that would not work properly.  It skipped when it was deflected a little to one side. Typical symptom of broken gear teeth.
I did not witness the crash.  It would be good to know the plane's attitude when it mated with Mother Earth.

Question- did the servo break cause the crash or was it due to the impact?

Took the servo apart:
Two of the black output gear (attached to the servo arm) teeth were broken.  One of the smaller white gear teeth was broken as well.  See photo.  The broken teeth are in the middle.  The sharp end of the screws point to the missing teeth.

Why is it dangerous?
Two things can happen when teeth are broken in flight...based on personal experience:
1) the servo will not deflect the flying surface.  When it is an aileron servo, you usually still have one good servo in the other wing.  The plane will still fly but with sluggish control.
2) dangerous.  When the servo starts to deflect near the broken gear, the pressure on the control surface will make the output gear to skip and lose neutral, sometimes significantly.  The next deflection can cause the control servo to doubly deflect.

Note the first photo where the pieces were embedded in the white grease.  If the teeth broke because of the crash, I would expect the black output gear pieces to be embedded beside each other.
The teeth were found on opposite ends of the white gear which means they broke when the gears were turning...in flight.

My opinion: I believe the gears broke in flight and caused the control problems.

Coming to a future episode of "Mayday", the crash investigation TV show. ;D

Frank